Throughout history, education had always a pivotal role in cultivating effective people for society. In fact, all great civilizations have had specific education plans for their children to become a useful members of their community, although they had various methods for their education system. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether teachers should assign projects on which students work together or working alone have more merits for them. Some people are inclined toward the idea that students must work alone to grow independent from other people, while some hold the exact opposite view. Having read several books about educational plans in the best countries, I strongly contend that the former is more promising. In what follows, I will aptly elucidate my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that working together have the advantage of learning teamwork. Since nowadays more crucial works in society require teamwork, it is vital to learn this merit in school days. Results of a recent study conducted by the government of the United States, reveals that schools which are teamwork-oriented are more successful in producing effective students for society to work on high priority projects for the government.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that when people are working together they can solve their problems by themselves. A prime example will illustrate this point much better. Imagine a group of students working on math homework, which are designed by their teacher, a student in the group have some problem learning some points of the homework, of course he or she has the advantage to look at other teammates and observe how they are getting the problem done, and for sure it will be so much effective for group's participants.
Finally, living in current society needs some capabilities to have social engagement with other people. Sociable people always come from social family or friends, which this method of teaching will certainly help an individual to become a social person in society. Recent statistic gathered by the University of Oklahoma indicates that students coming from schools which have a method of teaching teamwork’s abilities are more sociable than those which have not this merit.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, as soon realizes that teachers who design teamwork projects for their students, create some special abilities for them to be a social, and effective citizen in the society. However, there are a lot of points worth discussing that are not mentioned here. Nevertheless, that was a story of a nutshell. Readers should engage more by having other opinions to compare. At last, it is highly recommended to gain information about pioneer governments in educational plan to be updated about this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...s for their children to become a useful members of their community, although they had v...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in brief, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2411.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28728070175 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78895556123 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530701754386 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7704988615 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.55 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177880666162 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542817408576 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456133867785 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100304970998 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500493338411 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.