Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.

Always its a good team that leads to success in a game like cricket similarly teamwork has an immense value. Although, independent works are appreciated initially its the ability to work in a good group which made man achievable and successful in his career and life. Hence, I believe that it is vital to engage with a group of people rather than independently. There are several reasons for that which is elaborated below.

Firstly, working in a team will help in the overall success of a project. For instance, in technology company there are several projects each completed by many workers. It is the interaction and input from them leads to success of their work. On the contrary, if each one works independently without any common discussion their work would be a failure. Therefore, it is necessary to work as a group to achieve the result.

Secondly, criticisms will turn a man to his perfection mode.To illustrate, in a teamwork there are peers to criticize the individuals work this helps one to correct their mistakes. Consequently, the error will be correctly through phone calls or mails and the presentation will be perfect. Hence, group work shall shape a persons work thereby an entire different aspect is opened to him.

Thirdly, in a teamwork absence of any colleagues is taken care of. For example, in a game of cricket if one them is ill there are substitutes to play in his absence who are trained. Thus, the game goes well . However, this will not happen for an individual game like wrestling where there is only one of them and the best player is representing. Likewise, the individual if he fails the title is lost. Therefore, group work is essential and helpful in completing certain tasks.

To conclude, there is always a huge team work behind a mass success. Nevertheless, individual work shall gain short attention if it is put to use with a group shall make a great success for benefit of mankind.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Always its a good team that leads to success i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
Always its a good team that leads to success in a ...
^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...pendent works are appreciated initially its the ability to work in a good group whi...
^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he ability to work in a good group which made man achievable and successful in hi...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... will turn a man to his perfection mode.To illustrate, in a teamwork there are pee...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... perfect. Hence, group work shall shape a persons work thereby an entire different aspect...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ho are trained. Thus, the game goes well . However, this will not happen for an in...
^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only one of them and the best player is representing. Likewise, the individual i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, for instance, in short, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8343373494 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79029563195 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8762796388 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.25 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271433929153 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083167766596 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698544475765 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16003288809 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064873043147 0.0645574589148 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.