It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation

Governments are responsible to provide its people with various service in many areas such as public transportation and internet access. These kinds of areas are supported financially by government funds to improve. Many people believe that effective internet access is one of the most important responsibilities of the government while it is provided by private companies in many countries. In my opinion, public transportation should be in the first place to get the necessary investment from governments.

To begin with, governments should have consistent care in public transportation because in the daily life of a busy city people are dependent on it to travel easily one place to another. Transportation starts within the early morning while people are on way to their work and school and never ends for some places. A government should be aware that the transportation system in a city is effective and consistent. Imagine a day without the subway system in New York City. Life would be stopped if there was not online subway transportation. Therefore, transportation systems should be taking care of by government money to make sure they work properly.

Furthermore, public transportation plays an important role to attract tourist to a city because people are in need to travel easily when they visit a country. Besides a country's natural beauty and historical places, a country's public transportation has an effect on its annual tourist numbers. To be more specific, in a youtube channel while a couple travels the world they mention about a country's easy transportation, Turkey's bus transportation among all cities, system between cities was the one important reason why they visit that country. When a country is invested its money for improving the transportation system, it provides a high income for itself, as well. That is why governments should be invested their money in their public transportation.

To sum up, public transportation has an indispensable role in life and needs to be supported and improved by governments in the first place.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27878787879 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22563765665 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50303030303 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3443172408 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31419380111 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103472384941 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662410019648 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197211881912 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366850175349 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.