From my point of view, the best way to correct a teacher or a meeting leader when they are wrong is to ask for permission to talk and try to correct them politely.
To start with, if something important is mentioned wrong it needs to be fixed right away to avoid misunderstandings. It is a fact that people can make mistakes regardless their position or knowledge. If one confronts a situation that her manager makes wrong assumptions in an important meeting, she should correct the mistakes to avoid any misinterpretation. For example, in my last position as an advisor to the vice president of the company in a pharmaceutical company, we had an educational meeting with a client about a new drug substance submission. The vice president was asked to clarify several deficiencies on the file and he brought up another deficiencies about a completely different product. It was my responsibility to make a correction for the vice president and I politely asked for permission to talk. When I explained the details of the client's product, he understood that he was giving wrong information. Then, he thanked to me for reminding him and continued to discuss the submission. Besides, I was told that he was appreciated with my correction and was happy to have me as an advisor. Therefore, this experience taught me it is always important to correct people when they claim something wrong in a crucial situation.
Another point to consider is that not correcting a wrong point can be considered as one does not know that it is wrong. People have different approaches in a work environment. Even though some managers will believe their workers all of the time, some can make misinterpretations about them. What I mean is that if an employee waits for everybody to leave to correct her manager about claiming a wrong information, the manager might blame them for not correcting them in the meeting in case of thing do not go well. It will cause unnecessary problems for an employee. Thus, it is better to talk on time when they think something need to be corrected.
To sum up, It has always been important to make corrections politely when something is said wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clients'' or 'client's'?
Suggestion: clients'; client's
...lk. When I explained the details of the clients product, he understood that he was givi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ome managers will believe their workers all of the time, some can make misinterpretations ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, i mean, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84366576819 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08670414204 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495956873315 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1406282435 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130016060801 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407173512321 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458116619589 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971131747028 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407053422724 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.