It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends.
Friends are an important influence on our life. They play a huge role in our personal and social development. The group of friends one keeps, is a direct representation of one's own character. Some people agree that it is more important to keep old friends than to make new friends. Other disagree. In my opinion, keeping our old mates is more important than making new ones for following reasons.
First, we are already acquainted with the behavior and habits of our old friends and being accustomed to the new ones at the same level can be a bit difficult. We need to start a completely new chapter with our new friends and this may be troublesome for some of us. MY own personal experience provides a compelling evidence. During the beginning days of my university, I met a lot of new peoples but still I choose to stick with my old friends, who had also joined with me. I tried to make new friends, but to do so, I had to find additional gaps in my hectic schedule. Moreover, I have always been an introvert and no matter how hard I tried I could never be habitual to the behavior of my new mates. This experience taught me that it was more important and easy to keep the old ones rather than making new friends.
Second, our old friends can easily help us in our time of need. Being a long time friend with anyone has the implicit merit of gaining their trust and empathy and they are readily available to assist us in any task. For instance, a while back, I was fired my job. Having no source of income and bills to pay to my college, put me in a huge financial crisis. In such a dire situation, my old friends were the first to offer help. One of them loaned me some cash to help me keep on attending college while I was looking for a new job. Others provided me emotional support and even offered to live with them. Although, I had many new friends at that time, but still, my old friends were the first to reach out because they knew my past, they knew that I was a trustworthy and a good person. They were sure that I would have done the same for them. It is not that my new friends were not helpful or rude but it was just that they didn't knew me for long, in order to trust me blind folded. So, by this life experience, we can easily see the greater importance of old friends in our life.
In sum, old friends hold a much greater value than new ones in our life. Not only are we more habitual to their company but also they are more trustworthy and helpful for us. We should all realize this and not make the mistake of ignoring and abandoning our old mates for the sake of new ones
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making new ones for following reasons. First, we are already acquainted with th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taught me that it was more important and easy to keep the old ones rather than ma...
^^
Line 9, column 927, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...lpful or rude but it was just that they didnt knew me for long, in order to trust me ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 78.0 43.0788530466 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26008064516 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34785389058 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451612903226 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3859542213 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2692307692 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386392647584 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127288413654 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159298519147 0.0737576698707 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306817239143 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12568055097 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 10.9000537634 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.