It is more important to use your own knowledge and experience than ask others’ knowledge and experience to solve problems.
Whether people should use their knowledge and experience to deal with problems arouses a heated debate. Some people agree with this statement, while others claim that asking for help from friends and families is better. As far as I am concerned, I maintain that looking for other people's helps is the most favorable approach to solve difficulties. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, most people are concerned about efficiency, and consulting friends and family members can help people save a significant amount of time. For instance, I could not solve a difficult calculus question when I was taking a math class, so I texted my best friend, Todd, and asked him for the solution. As a result, he replied me a one-page PDF file with detailed steps on how to solve this problem in less than two minutes. Consequently, I could usually have my doubts answered in less than 20 minutes. On the other hand, if I decided to solve the diabolically hard calculus problem on my own, I might need to spend three hours searching for the answer online. Or, it might took me five hours to head to the library and look for some necessary books. Evidently, solving problems on my own is more time-consuming.
Take my friend, Jammy, as an example. Jammy did not know what he wanted to do in the future, so he encountered difficulties picking a major in college. Therefore, he reached out to his parents for help and asked for suggestions. Since Jammy's parents knew that he was proficient in math and logic, they all recommended he choose computer science. In retrospect, Jammy figured out that such a suggestion was terrific; he got straight As on various courses. That is, Jammy often told me that it was his parents' unbiased and objective opinion that helped him pick up a suitable major. On the contrary, my sister also faced some difficulties choosing a major when he studied in college. Yet, she thought that he was exceptionally talented in physics, so my sister eventually became a member of the physics department. Unfortunately, after she was constantly bombarded by unfathomable equations in quantum physics, my sister realized that her wrong impression of physics made her choose the wrong path. Had she reached out to my parents for help, they might have gave her a more objective opinions about college-level physics and dissuaded her not pick physics for her major.
In conclusion, I believe that asking for other people's helps is the most ideal way to handle problems considering the aforementioned reasons and examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...math and logic, they all recommended he choose computer science. In retrospect, Jammy ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1058, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...to my parents for help, they might have gave her a more objective opinions about col...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1058, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...to my parents for help, they might have gave her a more objective opinions about col...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, look, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82138729244 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3207439998 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7272727273 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151472259505 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474217784849 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068724421695 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114232861679 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690222791106 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.