In time of financial crisis, which of the following group of people should be firstly supported by the government.
-family with young children
-people who lost jobs recently
-retired people aged over 70
Different people hold different perspectives about who the government should support during an economic crisis. Some people maintain that aiding families with young children is better. Others believe that helping unemployed people is a more preferable method. Still, others claim that providing supports to retired people is better. As far as I am concerned, I believe that supporting the second group of people is the most ideal approach. My reasons are as follows.
Furthermore, the government must save money during the economic depression. Nevertheless, allocating too many budgets to young family members might make the government expend too much money. For example, the Kaohsiung City government decided to help families with young children get a decent education during the crisis. Nevertheless, lecturing a young student required a significant number of resources; the government allocated a billion dollars to hire elementary and preschool teachers, purchase suitable lands to establish new elementary schools, etc. Moreover, the city disbursed more than 4 billion dollars providing tuition to families. As a result, such policies caused a noticeable financial burden to the Kaohsiung City government. Contrarily, the Taichung City government offered assisted people who became unemployed in getting a decent job, and it only spent ten million dollars organizing several job fairs. In addition, the city only disbursed fifty million dollars to establish an employment website for job seekers to find a career. So evidently, governments usually won't waste too many resources battling the unemployment rate.
To begin with, the government should try its best to restore the economy during an economic crisis, and helping people who lost their jobs recently find a job can boost the economy. Take the Taipei City government as an example. A year ago, the government established three job fairs for young people to find a job during the Covid-19 outbreak. After such an event is held, approximately 60% of unemployed people found a suitable job, such as restaurant waiters and factory workers, to sustain their lives, leading to the unemployment rate in Taipei City decreasing from 7% to only 2%. As a result, Taipei City's economy started functioning again thanks to the increasing number of people working in restaurants and manufacturing. On the other hand, the Hualien County government supported old retired people by supplying old age allowances and elderly subsidies during the crisis. Unfortunately, these retired people were too old to be capable of working, so such a policy did not help Hualien City Improve its unempl
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45965770171 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88598883544 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550122249389 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1905198786 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354203712493 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105408691714 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790192046591 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263933042358 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856622198048 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.