Do you agree or disagree? Having a job in which you work with other people is better than having a job in which you work alone.
Some people think that working with other people is better than working alone. Others disagree with the statement. Personally, I agree with the statement. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, people focus on efficiency a lot, and working with other people can help them save a lot of time. To elaborate, my friend Todd works as a computer engineer in TSMC, the largest company in Taiwan, in a group of 20 engineers. Thus, whenever he encounters problems in his jobs, like forgetting how to call a function in Python, he can ask his seniors immediately. What’s more, they can reply to Todd in no more than 5 minutes. As a result, he usually finishes his coding project in less than 2 weeks. However, my sister is a researcher who works alone in Taipei Medical Center. Therefore, when she faces difficulties about not knowing which formula to analyze her data, she does not have people to ask. Eventually, it took her more than 5 months to complete her research project.
In addition, most people are lazy, and working with other employees can help people save a lot of energy. For example, my professor once worked in a technological company that sell financial software, and he joined a team of 4 people. Thus, his group divided the whole task into four sections, and each person only need to concentrate on their own part. To be more specific, my professor was only asked to design the user interface, and one of his colleagues only needed to program financial algorithms and software logics, etc. As a result, they were able to finish the whole task without spending too much effort. On the contrary, I worked as a teacher assistant alone in my professor’s laboratory one years ago. Accordingly, I had to reply emails, organize curriculums, and grade students’ assignments all by myself. Eventually, I spent a lot of effort doing my job every day.
Finally, people place an emphasis on happiness, and working with others can make people feel extremely happy. For instance, my cousin was a pharmacy major student. Yet, two years ago, he got a nurse job in Hsuang-He Hospital. He always told me that he had to do repetitive, annoying, and boring tasks every day, including querying his patient’s social security number, waiting for his doctor’s instruction, etc. What’s more, he was afraid of blood, so he often passed out when he put a needle into his patient’s arm. As a result, he felt extremely unhappy when he was working. Contrarily, I am a computer major student, and I am a computer programmer now. Since I enjoy coding and facing new challenges a lot, I always feel excited when I write a new piece of software and a website.
In conclusion, I agree that having a job in which you work with other people is better. This is because I focus on efficiency and happiness. Besides, I am an extremely lazy person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 701, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one year', 'a year', or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: one year; a year; years
...tant alone in my professor’s laboratory one years ago. Accordingly, I had to reply emails...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, finally, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78296146045 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75626017609 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549695740365 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 26.0 9.59856630824 271% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.63199194 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.064516129 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9032258065 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25806451613 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28630435908 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077866344633 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142219835704 0.0737576698707 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213944604321 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140402709617 0.0645574589148 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.