It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone extreme changes and became more complex. In ancient times, there was just a regular type of living and everybody follows a specific trend; therefore, no had a lot of choices to choose from. Most of the people were living in the rural area and were busy in agrarian occupations which had left from their ancestors. In this condition, there was no right about selecting when they want to work and the amount of wage was not the matter could be struggling on it. But now things have turned around; before hiring in a job everyone assesses all factors and match them by their interest and condition and then decide to accept it or decline. Regarding this issue some people prefer money to their spare time; conversely, others want to have fun times instead of putting themselves under pressure. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument to reach an appropriate conclusion.
It is no denying that we are experiencing hectic times during days; hence to have recovery and get relaxed and follow our business more energetic the best way is traveling and taking maximum benefits from our vacations. Peoples mostly are divided into three major categories; those who just advocate being easy-going and not taking the life seriously, some have a balance between their working and enjoyments and others are greedy and lust thinking to gather bucks. People in the first group, are in willing to find a job that has no interfere with their vacation programs and the rate of income is not considered by them. These individuals never go up from a certain level and would not be a successful manager or an outstanding character. The reason is obvious, they have no affair to being unique also are not ambitious. We should not forget that if we want to be succeeding in our own business we should ignore our comfort is some cases, just like wealthy people, celebrities and athletes.
Besides, being organized and putting the same value for both work and fun leads to have a juicy life and be able to prevent upcoming problems. A research done on the Melbourne university shows that the rate of divorce is dramatically low in the second group. The reason is that they have neither financial problems nor affection. Whereas, in two other groups, the theorem is quite the opposite; at first one, the financial problem is the main reason at the third one the affection problem is a highlight. People who tend to be work hard and their ultimate goal are collecting money finally come across serious problems; their heath may threaten or they couldn’t breed offspring appropriately. Although, being wealthy and working arduously is no bad in general, on some occasions it should not overshadow other topics.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that, firstly priorities and interests are different from one person to another. Thereupon, we couldn’t say that merely focusing on working is good or having a vacation is wasting time. Admittedly, the one thing is obvious is that we should consider all contributing factors and then we will have a normal and desired life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...dy follows a specific trend; therefore, no had a lot of choices to choose from. Mo...
^^
Line 4, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we will have a normal and desired life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, third, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 15.1003584229 238% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88181818182 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65580356239 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 310.0 212.727598566 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 844.2 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9482893012 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.045454545 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822119394144 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025065263991 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469579430613 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0502277167945 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026063855411 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.