land use for human needs or for endangered animals
Land is a limited resource on earth. People have been in arguments that land should be given to satisfy human needs for housing, farmland and industry instead of keeping for endangered species. I personally disagree with the idea that land should be kept to humans rather than endangered species. endangered species are habitants of earth, which they deserve to use the land they need for survival. I feel this for a few reasons, which I will be explaining in the following essay.
First of all, endangered species, although with their small number, are still an important member of the ecosystem. Taking land away from them will lead them into extinction. Their extinction will affect the whole chain of the ecosystem and will then affect other animals. An extinction in seals may cause a major disruption in the ecosystem in Antartic and as well as the nearby ecosystems.
Secondly, endangered species are precious resources for scientific research. It is important to ensure their survival so that we get enough information about them and that will enable us to have a better understanding of our earth. By studying these animals such as polar bears, we will have a better understanding of the conditions in the North pole and this will provide us of a better vision of the earth as a whole.
In conclusion, I am to the opinion of land should be kept for endangered species rather than for human needs because endangered species are important to sustain a balance in the ecosystem and because they can provide valuable information about earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Endangered
... humans rather than endangered species. endangered species are habitants of earth, which t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71800128973 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521072796935 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0358678097 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.461538462 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384275945647 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134372182111 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134435828985 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229768900766 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171734416342 0.0645574589148 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.