A large number of students feel more excited about classes in which they can openly talk to the teacher, and the lectures are at a minimum. On the other hand, some students believe that a class that includes more lectures and less open discussions is a better idea. In your opinion, which of the two alternatives is the best? To substantiate your response, utilize precise motivations and instances.
The time in university is one of the most important periods of our life because this time will help us to learn a lot of thinks and help us in our future career. I believe that it is better to have classes with open discussion and almost no lecture. Discussion helps students to improve various skills such as communication, public speaking, and it also helps students broaden their horizons.
First, open discussion helps students to learn how to interact with their fellow students. Doubtlessly, such interaction with other people helps students to widen their mindset and learn others’ perspectives. All in all, it will enrich your personality. For instance, during my first semester of graduate study, I had attended history which includes all discussion classes. In the beginning, I thought that open discussion would not be beneficial to lean but that was not true. One day, we were talking about the Muslim tradition origin and my friend, Ali, who was born in Turkey gave us a lot of information about the Muslim custom, habits, and their different religion. This helped me incredibly to understand their mindsets. For example, I knew why they are not allowed to eat pork. As you can see, an open discussion will help you understand better other people's points of view.
Second, open discussion in class will help students to become independent thinkers and speakers. These skills are valuable for any career. For example, in the past, I was really afraid of public speaking. However, the history of my first semester was really helpful to overcome my fear of public speaking. In order to get good grades, we were forced to participate in the discussion. I overcome my anxiety and started speaking in discussion and it was easier than expected. It also helped me become an independent thinker and put my idea in front of others. This experience taught me that is better to attend classes with open discussion because it provided me abilities of public speaking which is really important for my future career.
In conclusion, based on my experiences I strongly believe that open discussion and no lectures are preferable because it helps to understand other perspectives, and it provides skills of public speaking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[2]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'speakings'.
Suggestion: speakings
...the past, I was really afraid of public speaking. However, the history of my first semes...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it provides skills of public speaking.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04054054054 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78750865987 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491891891892 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9288121152 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8095238095 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197883896796 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637644631309 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646554952328 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132891362518 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274204918966 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.