Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present
It is argued that the past has no worth for those of us living in the present. However, studying the past helps us build and ensure a more flourishing present as the knowledge in all realms of life, including medicine, architecture and building, as well as politics, is directly related to the past.
Indeed, past events are of great value, especially in the field of medicine. Knowledge about endemic and pandemic diseases, medical practices as well as cures from the past is passed down through generations, making the progress in the field of medicine even more significant. Medical annals contain exhaustive knowledge how to fight against deadly diseases, such as plague or malaria. Without this, the mankind would have died out.
By the same token, architecture, one of the oldest sciences and arts in the history of mankind, traces the changes in architectural styles through various traditions and regions. Contemporary buildings have the same value and purpose as they had centuries ago, being used as a shelter or as a cultural symbol. However, today architecture became multi-disciplinary with specializations for each project type, technological expertise or project delivery methods, allowing us to create comfortable and safe buildings. Moreover, the preserved buildings from the past became objects of cultural heritage. The most famous of them Taj Mahal in India or Notre Dame de Paris in France are now available to the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining a major in the corresponding field can gather additional information from the past which can be used today.
Furthermore, politics is another example of “knowledge about the past is power.” Learning about prior conflicts and co-operation, we could prevent similar conflicts from happening and save thousands or even millions of lives. In addition, government officials feel better equipped and more confident when meeting with foreign partners to strengthen the relationships between the countries by recreating the traditions from the past. This comfort could be created via using national dress or cooking national dishes for the guests.
In conclusion, there is a strong connection between the past experience and today’s life, and we could hardly build the present without relying on the past. However, each individual must nonetheless decide for themselves whether it is still a worthwhile expense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...aris in France are now available to the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining a major in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gains'.
Suggestion: gains
...o the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining a major in the corresponding field can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...here is a strong connection between the past experience and today’s life, and we could hardly b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, still, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43548387097 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98648050185 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604838709677 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7977067902 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.941176471 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284435331393 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793982805246 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114284203392 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14795989092 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916332195728 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.