The reading states that humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. Several reasons illustrate how animals manage to migrate long distances. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refuted them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that the whales' brain power far exceeds that of most other animals. They could provide a sound basis for the ability to use a complex, abstract system of sensory stimuli such as the night sky for orientation. On the contrary, the speaker states that ability is different from intelligence, for example, dukes are not intelligent birds but born whit some abilities like finding their way on the water so this evidence is not convincing.
Furthermore, the lecture holds the view that humpback whales migrate in straight lines. Whales, cannot rely on land features; they could rely on stars at night to provide them with external signs by which to maintain direction over long distances. On the contrary, the professor emphasizes the fact that animals must send signals to guide them in the right direction. Biomagnetite gives them the ability to manage migration.
Finally, the author argues that humpback whales exhibit a type of behavior known as spy-hopping. One explanation for espionage is that whales look at stars and obtain information about their movements. Conversely, the professor dismisses this issue because spy-hopping is used by other animals such as sharks. Sharks do not look at the sky for migration, these animals use this ability for hunting. That is why the professor thinks the evidence is not convincing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, so, for example, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 266.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22180451128 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6360997688 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.141166191 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254728906341 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090221119962 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108109361879 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156573483506 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862023922287 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.