Many organizations try to draw people’s attention to serious problems, such as climate change or poverty. These organizations often use images (photographs and videos) to motivate people to take action against those problems. Some organizations use sad images showing problems, such as images of floods and fires caused by climate change or of people living in poverty. Other organizations use happy images of how problems can be solved, such as images of innovations that help protect the environment or of people successfully fighting poverty. In your view, which types of images are most effective in motivating people to take action: sad images or happy images? Why?
Nowadays, although our society has witnessed the unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, some serious problems including climate change or poverty are still earnest concerns among the masses. Some organizations are devoted to grappling with these issues, meanwhile, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that they should utilize sad images to prompt the public to take action, while others hold a reverse viewpoint that happy images will function better. As far as I am concerned, I definitely concur with the latter idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, happy images equip people with the methods to deal with those serious problems. It is undeniable that almost all people are good in nature. They are enthusiastic about assisting others, but it is enormously demanding for them to find professional ways. If the masses are provided with happy images vividly demonstrating how difficulty can be handled, they will be motivated to follow the models in a mature process to give hands to others who are mired in trouble. Moreover, they will grasp a more comprehensive and clear view of how the organizations function, and in a similar way, they are capable of mimicking those beneficial behaviors to improve the living standards of the poor, narrowing the disparity between haves and have-nots, and curb further pollution, improving the quality of our environment.
In addition, it is conceivable that people will be more touched by happiness than sadness and narrows, which will significantly enhance the efficiency of those organizations. Our human beings always believe in hope and those happy images tell people that our efforts will eventually pay off if we spare no efforts to contribute to those charity projects. To illustrate, if I know the effects of some cutting-edge technology aimed at protecting our environment shown by happy images, turning the desert into a wonderland, I will pour more money into this project. If I understand that every penny that I spend on poor people will largely improve their lives, I will allocate a huger amount of money to them.
Admittedly, some people harbor the idea that sad images will reinforce people's consciousness about the terrible fact, and thus push people to take more action for themselves and the future generation. Some sad images exhibit what will happen if we don't safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless, just because some people awaken their awareness by seeing sad images does not mean they will actually take further actions, owing to the lack of relevant knowledge and understanding about how to do and what will happen. People may also lose confidence in the process. These deficiencies cannot be readily compensated.
In a nutshell, since we need not only propaganda but also actual behaviors to improve the situations of all human beings, happy images showing how we can get to grips with problems are supposed to come top of the list and be emphasized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of how the organizations function, and in a similar way, they are capable of mimicking those be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19214876033 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8649888581 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7845288932 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.263157895 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4736842105 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248029958034 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784831400367 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555390318689 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141775247839 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713342608811 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.