Nowadays, although our society has witnessed the unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, some serious problems including climate change or poverty are still earnest concerns among the masses. Some organizations are devoted to grappling with these issues, meanwhile, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that they should utilize sad images to prompt the public to take action. However, as far as I am concerned, I definitely concur with the idea that happy images will function better, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, happy images equip people with the methods to deal with those serious problems. It is undeniable that almost all people are good in nature. They are enthusiastic about assisting others, but it is enormously demanding for them to help others in professional ways. If the masses are provided with happy images vividly demonstrating how difficulty can be handled, they will be motivated to follow the mature process to give hands to others who are mired in trouble. For example, after having a glimpse of the happy images shown by the UN, I grasp a more comprehensive and clear view of how this organization functions, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking some beneficial behaviors to improve the living standards of the poor, narrowing the disparity between haves and have-nots, and curb further pollution, improving the quality of our environment.
In addition, it is conceivable that people will be more touched by happiness than sorrow, which will significantly enhance the efficiency of those organizations. Our human beings always believe in hope and those happy images tell people that our efforts will eventually pay off if we try our best to contribute to those charity projects. To illustrate, if I know the effects of some cutting-edge technology aimed at protecting our environment shown by happy images, turning the desert into a wonderland, I will divert more resources to advocate this project. If I understand that every penny that I spend on poor people will largely improve their lives, I will donate a huger amount of money to them than before.
Admittedly, some people harbor the idea that sad images will reinforce people's consciousness about the terrible facts, and thus they can push people to take more action for themselves and the future generation. Some sad images exhibit what will happen if we don't safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless, just because sad images awaken individuals’ awareness, does not mean they will actually take further actions. Owing to the lack of relevant expertise and understanding about how to do it and what will happen, people may easily lose confidence in the process. These deficiencies cannot be compensated with ease.
In a nutshell, since we need not only propaganda but also actual behaviors to improve the situations of all human beings, happy images showing how we can get to grips with problems are supposed to come top of the list and be emphasized.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: the ability to write well is more important than that of speaking? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 73
- Many people value long lasting friendships Which ONE of the following qualities do you think is most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes 73
- Which do you think is the best way for students to make new friends? A. Joining a sports team; B. Participating in community activities. C. Traveling. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating young people about healthy food is important and should not be the job of families alone it should also be the responsibility of schools to teach their students about healthy eating 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of how this organization functions, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking some benefici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17791411043 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88522475637 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556237218814 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 810.0 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.3830276223 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.263157895 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246570915736 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797197069372 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568733126195 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142098107148 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712819406102 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.