Nowadays, education is still the hot-bottom topic among the public, and some countries have decided to expend enormous funds to make university education free. In this regard, a general controversy arises. Some people advocate that the government ought to divert a huge amount of money to pay for every university student’s tuition. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with this idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, allocating excessive money to universities just to reduce the tuition of students will grind down the overall quality of teaching and research. As we all know, the teaching quality of a professor is significantly associated with the number of students enrolled in a class. If the universities open their doors to all students, the classrooms will be too crowded to let teachers educate students in accordance with their aptitude. Moreover, the professors are also responsible for conducting research activities and writing scientific papers. With too many students packed in the school, they will no longer have enough time to focus on their own research owing to the workload of teaching. My physics professor is a prime example. Last semester, he opened a radioactivity course and more than one hundred students enrolled. Too many students in the classroom teased others and laugh loudly during the class, distracting my professor enormously. Besides, he had to allocate a large amount of time to correct students’ assignments, leaving no time for his own academic activities.
In addition, it is not the most efficient way to narrow the disparity between haves and not-haves and establish a fair education system for all citizens. In most countries, universities reap profits from the tuition to support their academic activities, erect facilities, and sponsor poor but industrious students. Tuition paid by students from affluent families is the prerequisite of the scholarships for students from poverty-stricken families. If government pours a large amount of money to make tuition free to the masses, universities will lose this more effective way to equalize the social echelon and achieve education equality. Besides, there are more places that need funds. For example, it will be a disaster for education and teaching if more students enter universities, but only possess limited facilities and share awful network connections.
Admittedly, free universities also deliver benefits to students. Students can ease their financial burden when perusing their academic dreams, and they will have more opportunities to enrich their knowledge and elevate their living standards in the future. However, the deficiencies of free university education can also trigger some negative outcomes that cannot be readily compensated. Thus, we should think more thoroughly when making the final decision.
In a nutshell, although knowledge is priceless, the tickets to the ship of education also need to be paid for. On no accounts should we ignore the adversities of free education, and it is too rash to label the free university education as the superior choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2649.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39511201629 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99521424917 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535641547862 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7404445461 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.96 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.64 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254628349988 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689151696332 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631237463409 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147997792313 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633639232043 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.