Nowadays, although our society has witnessed the unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, some serious problems including climate change or poverty are still earnest concerns among the masses. Some organizations are devoted to grappling with these issues, meanwhile, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that they should utilize sad images to prompt the public to take action, while others hold a reverse viewpoint that happy images will function better. As far as I am concerned, I definitely concur with the latter idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, happy images equip people with the methods to deal with those serious problems. It is undeniable that almost all people are good in nature. They are enthusiastic about assisting others, but it is enormously demanding for them to help others in professional ways. If the masses are provided with images vividly demonstrating how difficulty can be handled, they will be motivated to follow the mature process to give hands to others who are mired in trouble. For example, after having a glimpse of the delightful images represented on the UN’s official website, I grasp a more comprehensive and clear view of how an environment-friendly device works. In this picture, this equipment distills water from the vapors in the ambient environment to cultivate vegetation, ultimately turning a desert into a wonderland. It is easy to follow the instruction pointed on the picture, and by this means, I’m capable of creating a similar device to save water and conserve our environment.
In addition, it is conceivable that people will be more touched by happiness than sorrow, which will significantly enhance the efficiency of those images. Our human beings always believe in hope and those happy images tell people that our efforts will eventually pay off if we try our best to contribute to those charity projects. In this regard, it is investigated in the psychological field that after seeing enjoyable pictures about the fact that poverty-stricken families are enabled to improve their well-being and life quality, people are willing to donate more money and donate even more times in the future. Such images can arise people’s compassion more efficiently and these feelings are significantly associated with the positive cognitive behaviors in our brains, leading to further helpful behaviors and actual actions.
Admittedly, some people harbor the idea that sad images will reinforce people's consciousness about the terrible facts, and thus they can push people to take more action for themselves and the future generation. Some sad images exhibit what will happen if we don't safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless, owing to the lack of relevant expertise and understanding about how to do it and what will happen, people may easily lose confidence when take action, haunting their further movements. These deficiencies cannot be compensated with ease.
In a nutshell, since we need not only propaganda but also actual behaviors to improve the situations of all human beings, happy images showing how we can get to grips with problems are supposed to come top of the list and be emphasized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2715.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.302734375 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95617131135 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556640625 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8301554402 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250432099424 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722261317543 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573753263677 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139371769129 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684074698451 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 86.8835125448 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.