Many people have a close relationships with their pets. These people trat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Pets are our friends, and takin care of them has a myriad of benefits. I think that having close relationships with pets is an advantageous thing. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
First of all, pets teach people to be responsible, especially the youngest ones. When a person takes an animal to his home, he has to consider that it is part of his daily duties now to take care about the creature. For example, before buying a dog for my son I elucidated him, that from that moment the puppy depended on him, and the young man has to take it seriously and fulfill his new responsibilities anyways . I described to my little boy that he has to feed and walk the dog twice a day (even in a rainy weather), play with the animal (even if he is tired), and look after the puppy, if it falls sick (even if my son is sick as well). My son was really fascinated by an idea of having the dog, so he followed all my requirements successfully. To that end, experience of having a dog by my boy accustomed him to be liable.
Secondly, when people treat their home animals like family members, pets pay them back with their tremendous love and boundless fidelity. Dedicated pets can protect their owners in a danger situation and even save their life. My own experience illustrates it very well. As I said above, my son has a dog and all my family adore the animal. A few month ago, at one night, we were seriously threatened by attempted robbery- one suspect with weapon was trying to break into our house. It could have fatal consequence, yet our dog recognized a noise, jumped on the one of the robber and put him down. This way the dog saved our lives. This example demonstrates that dogs, who are loved by the family they live in, are always ready to protect it.
To sum it up, I feel that people should treat pets as family members. This is because it teaches them to be responsible and can protect them from harm. All things considered, it is reasonable to assume that having close relationships with pets benefits people`s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fulfill his new responsibilities anyways . I described to my little boy that he ha...
^^
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd, experience of having a dog by my boy accustomed him to be liable. Secondly, ...
^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riously threatened by attempted robbery- one suspect with weapon was trying to br...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to break into our house. It could have fatal consequence, yet our dog recognize...
^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. This example demonstrates that dogs, who are loved by the family they live in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, i feel, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42021276596 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59025867738 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534574468085 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3950155607 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166260402053 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538214085702 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668626635915 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116332242257 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399949772604 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.