In many places, students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school. Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning, but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning would be better for students. Which view do you agree with and why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Generally, schools advocate the commencement of school day early in the morning in order to improve students’ performances and make students cherish the time. When it comes to whether students appreciate their time more if they commenced their schooling hour early in the morning, individuals’ opinions differ from person to person. While some might consider that the earlier the school begins, the more students behave well to use their time efficiently, I, on the contrary, contend that not forcing students to attend schools early actually helps students to utilize their days.
To commence with, one of the most compelling reasons in advocacy of the thesis is that students can avoid being sleepy and unclear if they are not forced to go to school too early. In normal school schedules students nowadays have, students suffer from having less time to sleep and resulting in the sleepiness and lacking of motivations in the early morning. Contrarily, a later school commencement would allow students to manage their awakening time and therefore allow them to take the classes in their perfect performances. For example, my cousin Hachi attend a school swimming club so that she is always tired in the night, requiring more sleeps. However, the morning self-study time school requires students brings not only Hachi herself but all the students who are having much daily energy consumption into torture. They cannot sleep enough or enjoy free time, resulting even worse behaviors in class times. Hachi and other students went to the headmaster’s office to claim their issues, and as a result, the school stopped requiring students to study early in the morning. Students can now have sufficient sleep, good performances in classes and also a good free time usages.
In addition, students who are not required to go to school early can solve the rush hour issues. Students who uses transportation means every day to attend school greatly suffer from being jammed into busy trains and buses. Therefore, students cannot put their best performance in school works since they are already too tired when they reached school. Additionally, scientific research shows that a twenty-minute train trip in a rush hour put more stresses than that of suffocating oneself does. If school do not commence their class time as early as all the other companies and schools do, students can avoid exposing them to stresses and eventually, put their best performances on the academic pursuit.
Furthermore, students can recognize the importance of morning time and efficiently utilize it. Students always suffer from not having enough time to efficiently use the morning hours which is suitable for studying. Doing exercises and having nutritious breakfast. Just an hour of delay from normal school commencement would allow students to sufficiently utilize the time in the morning, in specific, going for jogging, reading some books, cooking a nice breakfast to energize themselves, and all the things students can do to enjoy perfect beginning of a day.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that morning classes avoid students’ laziness and help them become more abstinent, the benefits of commencing schools later far outweighs the drawbacks of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the earlier the'. Did you mean 'earlier the'?
Suggestion: earlier the
... person. While some might consider that the earlier the school begins, the more students behave...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2741.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29150579151 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72938087912 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480694980695 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6026149893 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.523809524 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321709904 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120253412834 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756819310068 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210562437372 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638110225433 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.