In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the mornin

Currently a growing controversy issue arises as to whether students should attend school early in the morning. Regarding to this issue, people’s views vary from individuals to individuals. Some people believe starting the school day early is helpful for students’ academic performance. Conversely, from my perspective, students should be allowed to attend to school at later time in the morning.

The primary reason to support my idea is that attending to school late contributes to students’ study efficiency. To be precise, only with enough sleeping time students are capable to focus on class, instead of distracted by other irrelevant affaires. Additionally, students can be more energetic to devote themselves into studying. However, students who are forced to attend school early in the morning have less stamina than students who are allowed to arrive school later. Indeed this situation can be even worse when students’ houses are miles away from schools. Consequently, insufficient sleeping begets negative academic outcome. Take my personal experience as an example: My former high school was the advocator of hard working. Which meant we have to get in to class room extremely early. Not surprisingly, students such as me could not focus on learning. This results in academic deterioration. However, when school authorized us to attend to classroom later, we, the students, became more efficient when studying.

What’s more, another reason to support my idea is that attending to school later in the day can be beneficial for students health. It is a sobering fact that nowadays students are confronted with heavy working schedule. They need some time to unwind their body, and according to some research sleeping can be really helpful in relieving stress. Attending to school later in the day means having more sleeping time. This no doubt will be beneficial for students’ physical heal. Additionally, more time available in the morning also means students may have more time to handle their daily affairs such as having a nice breakfast and a fantastic shower. However, if they are asked to attend to school early, students tend to ignore eating breakfast. In fact, doing this is extremely bad for their vulnerable stomaches.
In sum, from what has been discussed, we may draw a conclusion that arriving late to school is good for students’ development.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ntly a growing controversy issue arises as to whether students should attend school early in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...who are allowed to arrive school later. Indeed this situation can be even worse when s...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 738, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hool was the advocator of hard working. Which meant we have to get in to class room e...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, as to, in fact, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32275132275 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84892508179 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2222098656 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8333333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35428653518 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103566911966 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11151708588 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230259192055 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103447673988 0.0645574589148 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.