In modern days, parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents.
Parents and children can always learn from each other in various means. Considering the intimate relationship between them, they are willing and likely to achieve this goal. While some people hold the belief that children learn more from their parents than parents can learn from children, I oppose this motion and believe that, as a matter of fact, it works another way around nowadays.
First, today’s parents would learn more from their children than children can learn from them because the old generation can benefit from the youngsters by absorbing the natural virtues on them. As many people believe, humans are born with good natures, and it is the society that changes their naturally good qualities. Following such belief, children are supposed to be innocent and kind, which are the qualities that many adults lack. For instance, children born without the concept of robbing and stealing, which are believed to form later in life and are dependent on one’s particular experience. Those who first commit such a crime often feel guilty; this is because even if no one has told them that this kind of behavior was wrong, they can still sense this way since they are all born naturally good. Thus, parents who form evil minds can learn from their children through their innocent behaviors.
In addition, as the technology develops swiftly, it is hard for parents to keep up with the pace with modern society. But children are always fast learners, who can, in turn, teach their parents about the latest technologies. To illustrate, say a new game comes out; it typically takes today’s children only half a day to grasp the essence of it, but to parents, learning such a new game would take ages. This is because milleniums adapt more to modern technology, since they are born at the exact time when advanced technology thrives. Parents, in comparison, are too traditional and agedß to learn these stuff.
To sum up, parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from them in today’s society, as parents can learn the naturally kind qualities and the newest technologies from them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a matter of fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99717514124 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40806741232 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0956473573 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.648485764715 0.236089414692 275% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234361961722 0.076458572812 307% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.237112989294 0.0737576698707 321% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.484944309859 0.150856017488 321% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15436112621 0.0645574589148 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.