Nowadays, with the rapid development of new technologies, some people reckon that children are more proficient in absorbing the most up-to-date information. Meanwhile, their parents cannot keep pace with the fast-paced modernization process. Thus, some people contend that parents can learn more from their children. However, as far as I’m concerned, children can learn as much as their parents can learn from them.
On the one hand, family education is, and will remain, essential for children’s upbringing, because parents not only own lots of valuable life experiences that can enlighten their children but also can educate children about attitudes and values, goods and evils, rights and wrongs, etc. Encouraged and companied by parents, children can benefit in a wider range. After all, these life and moral lessons cannot be easily learned by children on their own without parents’ guidance and instruction. Although children can have all the latest facts at their fingers, expanding knowledge through the Internet and new technologies, they are not mature enough to make good judgments. My personal experience is a prime example of this point. Back in primary school, I always watch videos on the Internet. At that time, I was unaware that some videos contained violence and dirty words. Although my parents were not familiar with these online websites, they pointed these issues out and helped me find more suitable videos to watch. Thus, children can learn from their parents.
On the other hand, we have to admit youngsters’ ability to learn new things is remarkable. Children can make full use of new knowledge that their parents may not know. In this case, parents can learn from their children. Children always have new ideas and can share news from a new perspective with their parents, helping parents generate creative ideas and even putting the ideas into practice during work. Take programming as an example. For many years, some parents rarely have opportunities to familiarize themselves with basic programming knowledge, and they don’t have enough time and energy to indulge in learning it. When they need to utilize programming in the workforce, their children whose compulsory subjects include programming can provide help. Children can help their parents to tackle even the simplest mistakes or problems with programming. And during this process, children may also provide unique suggestions for their parents’ work.
In a nutshell, both children and their parents can learn from each other from different perspectives. There is no need to hold a biased view toward this issue, underestimating the advantages of any part. Thus, I believe that combing the advantages of both parents and children can generate more excellent results, making the education and development of society become better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this life' or 'these lives'?
Suggestion: this life; these lives
...an benefit in a wider range. After all, these life and moral lessons cannot be easily lear...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, after all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38202247191 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71156537716 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532584269663 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.2498524016 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.96 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.629659932004 0.236089414692 267% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222076746854 0.076458572812 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208341729426 0.0737576698707 282% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.460601062637 0.150856017488 305% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759456911323 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.