It is not an unfamiliar scene that a child is screaming at supermarkets or forcing their parents to but toys for them by threatening to cry at toy stores. Hard as it is, anxious parents are trying to find the best way to reshape the characters of their kids. Some people argue that the best way to help children behave better is to spend more time talking with them. Others suggest that giving children more attention and supervise them while they are playing with their friends works best. Nevertheless, from my perspective, the most efficient way to deal with this problem is to limit the types of TV programs and movies.
On the one hand, setting limitations on types of TV programs that children can have access to will indirectly but effectively contribute to the change of behavior pattern of kids. Videos, with sounds and images, are vivid materials for children to mimic. Meanwhile, most programs and movies are designed to be attractive, which will increase kids' interest to watch. During the process of watching, kids will be influenced by or without awareness. As a result, the quality of these materials is essential as they determine what kids learn. For instance, some programs have negative impacts on kids, such as porn movies, violence, drugs, and other criminal acts. However, cartoons that are designed to inspire kids and to teach them proper manner will lead kids to be more friendly and reasonable. By carefully select watching material, parents can achieve educational goals for their kids without too much effort.
On the other hand, the chances are high that spending more time to have conversations with children is merely a waste of time. Unlike grown-ups, small children do not share the same patient, and thus, a long and dogmatic conversation will do nothing but to make kids bored and wish to get away with them. Apart from that, kids see the world differently as adults do. For example, when a mother tells her little girl that she should be a better kid and should not cry for toys. Nonetheless, the message will get the girl confused as she may not have a clue about what is "being nice." All she wants to do is to get that toy, and the only way she could success is to cry aloud. Taking makes no scene if one party could not understand the other.
Besides, monitoring kids while they are playing with their peers will possibly make children more aggressive and behave the opposite of what parents are hoping as a method to express unsatisfaction. Children have their own rules among their peers which parents may not understand, such as a silly promise and the way they choose their best friends. Interference will make kids feel disrespected and get hurt. Furthermore, they may be isolated by other kids if parents insist on supervising.
In summary, the best way to educate kids and let them get rid of bad behaviors is to wisely choose videos for them to watch because they could give children the most vivid impression of specific actions. In the meantime, taking to children is less efficient as children may not understand worlds from adults and supervising kids while they are with their peers could do damages to children's confidence and dignity, forcing them to misbehave.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86799276673 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59108219122 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484629294756 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 802.8 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5146740688 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.68 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.12 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24331184008 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072643391346 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355813856202 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14893192777 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019318896672 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.