It’s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school.
Interest is the best teacher, and students tend to perform well if they are interested in their subjects. Some people argue that the best way to inspire interest among students is to explain the usage of such knowledge and how the understanding of it will help students in real life. Neverthelss, from my perspective, illustating how subjects can help student live better outside of the campus is not the best way to interest students.
On the one hand, there are many subjects that appear to be useless in real life. For instance, mastering in history may not be a determaining factor for students major in Finance. What's more, Math seems of little importance for art students. Addmittedly, these subjects will extend the knowlege range for students and may improve the skill of thinking in the long run. However, with limitted time and energe, students are more likely to devote themselves in to subjects that are most efficient to them. For example, a finance studnet tend to study harder in Bank Management instead of history no matter how the teachers explain the benifit of learning it.
On the other hand, the diffculity of some subjects can hinder the students from being interested regardless of how useful those subjects can be. For instance, subjects like Physical and high-level math can be abnormally complecated and hard to master. It will be hard for students to show any interest in the equations of these subjects unless the students are originally have passions for them. Students may studeny hard not becasue they like these subjects, but because they need to pass them to graduate.
Besides, there are many other ways to atrract students other than informing them the usage of these subjects. For example, teachers can diliver lectures in a more humorous way by making jokes. In addition, incentive program such as schoolarship could encourage students to study harder. Meanwhile, increase the chances for students to participate and get involoved in classes could also be a effective way to draw attention for students.
In summary, helpping students to become more interested in a subject by informing the usefulness in real life to students is not the best way to make student more intereted in study material as some subjects seems to be useless in real life and some subjects are too hard to be intereting for students. Besides, there are many other ways that are no worse than telling the usage of knowledeg to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...g factor for students major in Finance. Whats more, Math seems of little importance f...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 373, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ects unless the students are originally have passions for them. Students may studeny...
^^^^
Line 13, column 391, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... get involoved in classes could also be a effective way to draw attention for stu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01707317073 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65600797179 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456097560976 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3663586445 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.263157895 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503265929582 0.236089414692 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161531243442 0.076458572812 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11214168695 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312089183644 0.150856017488 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107060332012 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.