Most students are taught different subjects by different teachers while some students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
Nowadays, the emergence of different types of education is shown to be an inclining line. Some people suggest it would benefit students to be taught by different teachers. Personally, it has to be admitted that advantages of both of the situations are clear. They both have something special which is good for students.
Strictly speaking, we can apparently find the situation of being taught by one teacher is helpful. To start, students can easily adapt the single teaching style which only can be found in this situation. As there will only be one instructor to teach the student, there will only be a single pattern of teaching which does allow student to make the adaptation rapidly. In this case, students can spend less time on adaptation and more time focusing on their study. Second, students can gain more attention from a single teacher to get better development. Since there is just one teacher that will instruct the specific student, the teacher will pay much more attention to the students. Consequently, students can easily get the answers to the questions or quickly get the corrections of his or her tests which may better themselves.
Notwithstanding, benefits can be discovered when a student is being taught by more than one teachers as well. First, it convinces me that different fields are majored in by different people that students can indeed get better knowledge of specific fields. When different teachers are specializing in different fields, they are given enough time both to make a better preparation and to study further in one field. On top of that, a single pattern of teaching may not be applied on every individual that different students may need multiple styles. For instance, not every student has the good enough ability to comprehend new knowledge. While a single style may be the one which is very fast-paced that students cannot follow. So when students are taught by many teachers, they needn't worry about this.
All in all, advantages of both of the situations do exist. I believe if students themselves as well as their parents carefully choose a suitable style, students can benefit a lot without any doubt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one teacher', 'a teacher', or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: one teacher; a teacher; teachers
... a student is being taught by more than one teachers as well. First, it convinces me that di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gh ability to comprehend new knowledge. While a single style may be the one which is ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: needn't
...dents are taught by many teachers, they neednt worry about this. All in all, advan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01944444444 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71562551056 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494444444444 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.89219157 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.35 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402323332597 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139048209502 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119275267294 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251650336451 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788175466236 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.