Movies and TV programs made in your own country are more interesting than those made in others.
The films and TV retails contains a lot of interesting information about the country which their produced. Some people believe that the films and TV programs which made in local country is interesting much more than those are made abroad, while there are some others who hold the opposite notion. As far as I am concerned, the movies and TV programs produced in other countries are far interesting than those made in our country because not only do they helpful to know better other countries, but also they help us to find other solutions for same problems they have.
The first reason which should be mentioned here is that the films and TV programs which made in other countries are beneficial to identify their fellow countries. Every single film to appeal more and more spectators should encapsulates its country’s cultural and political values. For example in a typical film with typical story that explain a social disaster like divorce, it has to demonstrate the family condition. This family lives in a house and the people in the story lives in a city with enormous streets, valleys even rural areas. Watching that film or TV program, one could discover the condition of the living in that part of country as well as the interaction between people. But it is not only the issue, other suitable information about political affairs like as electoral process and nomination of candidates can be define by watching drama based stories.
The another subtle point which deserves some point here is that watching other countries’ programs or films help audience to find better solution for their own problems. It is a fairly well known issue is that the mankind is same in every county and every place who lives. He has feeling and emotions and owned the same entity. Therefore, some emotional or even cultural problem would probably occurs in everywhere. The family problem is a useful example. By watching a film which deal with family problems and their consequences, one can observe his or her problem in the story. He can evaluate the situation and make a decision. For example the film “desperation Nader and Simin” is a best film in this criteria. The film involves a lot for family member’s interaction and useful dialogues. After watching this film everyone can draw a conclusion in reforming his or her family communications.
In recapitulation, the films and TV programs from other countries are more interesting because they show beneficial information about their local country as well as additional solutions for widespread cultural problems. It is highly time the authorities to show the proper TV series and programs which contains solution for our social problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...w better other countries, but also they help us to find other solutions for same problems they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'encapsulate'
Suggestion: encapsulate
... appeal more and more spectators should encapsulates its country’s cultural and political va...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'occur'
Suggestion: occur
...or even cultural problem would probably occurs in everywhere. The family problem is a ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...os;desperation Nader and Simin' is a best film in this criteria. The film in...
^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...Nader and Simin' is a best film in this criteria. The film involves a lot for f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tains solution for our social problems.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262396694215 0.229887763892 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.140495867769 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101239669421 0.0866891130778 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.051652892562 0.046263068375 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0495867768595 0.0685040099705 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109504132231 0.118717715034 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0309917355372 0.0351676179071 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.761766486 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0144628099174 0.0309702414327 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.105371900826 0.0887237588012 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0165289256198 0.0209618222197 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0206611570248 0.0139019557991 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2711.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 447.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06487695749 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355704697987 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2774049217 0.251872472559 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208053691275 0.174417080927 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120805369128 0.112833075102 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.761766486 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454138702461 0.524397521467 87% => OK
Word variations: 50.1688836997 59.2087087015 85% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2857142857 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8870743497 48.84282405 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.095238095 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 49.0262064557 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.66666666667 1.45489161554 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311560177054 0.300154397459 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116099361133 0.103427244359 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0648676373195 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478730025836 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13573410883 0.151897553556 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10937231115 0.114077575197 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098345801739 0.0781384742642 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410249953553 0.336927656856 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0874607828236 0.067059652881 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238732378845 0.210909579961 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115334738282 0.0618886996521 186% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.