The article states that the buzzing- people who are hired by companies to promote products individual- has generated a lot of controversy in society and should be banned. The author provides three reasons of support. However, in the listening material a buzzer explains that the description in the reading is misleading, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading stands that the buzzers do not reveal that they are being paid by the advertising companies. In contrast, the buzzer says that if the buzzers don’t tell people the trust how they trust the buzzers to take the product. Moreover, companies find and hire costumers who believe that the product is good. According to him, buzzing is different from an ordinary advertising in which an actress reads some lies. The buzzer shares his or her personal experiences of using the product with costumers.
Second, the article claims that the costumers would be more pessimist about a product when they encounter with advertising on television or on paper. The buzzing, on the other hand, mislead them while they are not be aware that the buzzers are being paid to advertise the product. Nevertheless, the buzzer explains that people know that the buzzer can answer a lot of their questions such as the product's price, services and how long he uses the product or service. The costumers will not buy the product should the buzzer cannot answer their questions.
Third, the reading posits that the buzzing would be harmful for social relation as well as for civilization. In contrast, the buzzer opposes this point by saying that if the company believe that a product is not good, the company will not recruit buzzers. In other words, people who try the buzzed products, they will find the buzzers people who are they can trust.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...r hand, mislead them while they are not be aware that the buzzers are being paid t...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'as for', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as well as', 'in other words', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242774566474 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.179190751445 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0491329479769 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0375722543353 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375722543353 0.0277247811725 136% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121387283237 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0375722543353 0.0370669169778 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61426724502 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0115606936416 0.0208969081088 55% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.138728323699 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.028901734104 0.0158828679856 182% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0231213872832 0.0114777025283 201% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1820.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 302.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02649006623 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390728476821 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281456953642 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172185430464 0.187439937562 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112582781457 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61426724502 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503311258278 0.539623497131 93% => OK
Word variations: 50.2983124335 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1333333333 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4695306615 49.3711431718 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06666666667 0.878197800319 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.2790286976 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.57954545455 1.90840788429 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.584211317164 0.549887131256 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148334165558 0.142949733639 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0984135439004 0.0787303798458 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.614783751142 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13545729124 0.139662658121 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284612730283 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852471478334 0.103435571967 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.559435306507 0.414875509568 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0559281425785 0.0530846634433 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.458960881797 0.40443939384 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377565591587 0.0528353158467 71% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.