In recent few years, there has been a widespread debate on whether reading the original book before watching the movie is better or vice versa. Personally, I believe watching the movie is much more preferable. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, people who watch movies instead of reading books save a lot of time. The more books I read, the more is wasting time. This is true because when I want to read a book, I have to spend at least ten hours to finish 150 pages. On the other hand, turning on the television, searching for a movie, and watching it. It takes only three hours at much. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was an undergraduate student, my teacher assigned an assignment to read a book called the old man and the sea. I did not read it until the night before discussion class. It took 3 hours to finish 50 pages out of 160. Accordingly, I searched on the internet and I found a movie for this book. I set up and watched the movie. As a result, I saved the time from reading the whole book as well as I was able to discuss all the book with my peers. As you can see, If I had not watched the movie, I would not have saved time and participated in class.
In addition to saving time, people who watch movies save money. Movies are usually cost five to twenty dollars, but there is no limit on the price of books. For instance, when I want to watch a movie, I just turn my television and choose a movie between thousands because I have a subscription for Netflix, which cost only $8 monthly for the unlimited watch. On the contrary, buying a book cost $10. In addition, I watch hundreds of stories by watching the TV, but only one story by reading a book. As a result, I gain a lot of information from watching movies as well as saving money.
Frankly speaking, if you do not have time and money, you can watch a movie instead of reading a book. But, also the books are not changeable with movies because it has a different taste for a lot of people who like to imagine a view that the writer tries to illustrate in a few pages.
To conclude, I strongly believe that watching movies is much more practical. This is because not only it saves my time, but also it saves my money.
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 60
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 71
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad multi 85
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubscription for Netflix, which cost only monthly for the unlimited watch. On the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, frankly, if, so, well, at least, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27188940092 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42251275141 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463133640553 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5983538011 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3076923077 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360541339671 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111082300049 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748132102427 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218634575107 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755003833944 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 58.1214874552 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.19 10.9000537634 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.