“Often we are asked to collaborate in team projects at events, school, and even work. Sometimes we are required to work with a group of people who share our opinions and ideas. However, sometimes we need to work with groups of people who have entirely different opinions then us.”
Which do you prefer? Use reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples.”
Working in team is a ubiquitous necessity and reality all over the world and in all fields of works or activities. It is also a special ability common not only in human specie but also in animal species, when they related with each other to obtain advantage or not. I prefer to work with a group with the same points view. I feel this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, when a work is done by a team that share opinions less stress is generated. This is because people agree in many aspects of how they should perform their work, therefore, will be a reduction in discussions and misunderstandings. Moreover, a peaceful and enjoyable environment is generated. For example, many companies use the strategy of divide their employees into teams that share close personalities, thoughts and beliefs to guarantee that more work will be done with a decline of disagreements.
Secondly, working with a group who agrees with each other will decline the time wasted looking for an agreement of ideas. In other words, the work will be done quickly since the team have common sense. Although may occur some disparate ideas, because it is expected that different people may present controversial beliefs sometimes, the group will solve the situation by choosing the best approach as they share the same mission and vision.
Finally, the results reached by team will be increased. A focused group of people that share and concentrate their efforts in the same direction will achieve their goals. A group of people who direct their energy randomly, however, will hardly obtain their expected results. For instance, in a school group of students that are together to create a science project if they since the beginning trace a strategy of what and how to do their project they will certainly obtain an ineffable grade and reach the expected result with the experiment.
To sum up, I prefer to work with a team that share my opinions. This is because it is less stressful, we will spend fewer time discording with others and the results will be increased. Working well as team with agreement and confidence is the pivotal factor for the success of the project since the results will be exacerbated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90884718499 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67184238743 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487935656836 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4830841306 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.722222222 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302825187019 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106470304365 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671413955907 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181630923022 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283906758759 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.