A or DA: Governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times” said by Charles Dickens in the beginning of ‘A tale of two cities’. Admittedly, the last few decades have witnessed the great achievement of humankind in booming economy and flourishing civilization. While at the same time, environment problems arise and turn out to be much more serious than before. Therefore, the discussion on government expenditure has come to a vogue. Should governments focus its budgets more on environmental protection or economic development? As far as I am concerned, I commit to the notion that environmental protection, though useless at first glance, should be more emphasized and therefore give more budgets by the governments.
Admittedly, no one would deny that is of vital importance. With the help of economic development, the quantity and diversity of opportunities provided for workers are largely increased. And the spread spectrums of choices not only contribute to the development of citizen’s living standard but also benefit to the stability of the whole society. Considering the unemployment crisis is troubling not only developing countries but also developed countries, we therefore cannot overlook the significance of economy. In such case, governments are supposed to construct manufacture factories, promote the education of workers and inspire innovation and further researches, all of which need investment and a considerable amount of budgets.
However, environmental protection is much more urgent and serious. The first and foremost reason is that environment is closely linked to human health. Environment equips humankind the fundamental resources that are indispensable for our life. What’s more, a clean and beautiful environment concerns the health of everybody. Atmosphere full of dust and toxic gas will lead to the respiration diseases, food suffered from excess pesticide will be detrimental to people’s organism. This point is best illustrated with the example of Beijing. Due to the accumulation of exhausts and pollutants emitted by the cars and factories over time, a huge layer of dust has surrounded the city and contaminated the air. Because of this, pedestrians on the streets are always wearing breathing masks. In this case, compare with the tiny economical achievement that we have gained, environmental problems have more profound and grievous effects, and are in need of more budgets and attention.
Moreover, there lies a more in-depth reason: environmental development is the basis of economic development and they two cannot tell apart. Most mass production relies on the natural resources like coal, wood and so on. Once the environment is ruined and cannot provide enough resources, our economy will come to an end. On the other hand, a livable environment always gives rise to the development of tourism and culture influence of one country. To quote Beecher, ‘ what came to us as seed may go to the next generation as blossom, and what came to us as blossom may go to the them as fruit.’ This means when governments make decisions, they should take environmental protection into account in top priority for the long-term prosperity of humankind.
In a nutshell, governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection instead of economic development, for environment is not only the basis of economy but also related to the human’s health and their future
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 581, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...nd what came to us as blossom may go to the them as fruit.' This means when governm...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257551669316 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.127186009539 0.158761421928 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0969793322734 0.0866891130778 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0572337042925 0.046263068375 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0254372019078 0.0685040099705 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112877583466 0.118717715034 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0302066772655 0.0351676179071 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21237416564 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0286168521463 0.0309702414327 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00158982511924 0.00188951952338 84% => OK
Determiners: 0.0858505564388 0.0887237588012 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0206677265501 0.0209618222197 99% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00953895071542 0.0139019557991 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3466.0 2387.08602151 145% => OK
No of words: 537.0 408.028673835 132% => OK
Chars per words: 6.45437616387 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402234636872 0.338922669872 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.342644320298 0.251872472559 136% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.262569832402 0.174417080927 151% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.206703910615 0.112833075102 183% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.21237416564 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 68.6869818682 59.2087087015 116% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6538461538 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5800975969 48.84282405 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.307692308 120.699889404 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6538461538 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.644075263715 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 54.9182781836 45.7405998639 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.90909090909 1.45489161554 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171822133232 0.300154397459 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0838931930544 0.103427244359 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0592419338347 0.0752933317313 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.491371128329 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167381685351 0.151897553556 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915182669528 0.114077575197 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171426739942 0.0781384742642 219% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469464647848 0.336927656856 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0496361216241 0.067059652881 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165093749346 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11161599161 0.0618886996521 180% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.