In order to adapt to the life in university and succeed, if you are a freshman, which method do you think is better: 1. attending a one-week orientation or introduction program when you are in the university campus and before classes begin 2. meeting regularly in your first year with students in your major field who have entered the university for several years.
Conforming to life in a university is difficult task for many students, but they cope with this problem by various means. In fact, learners’ way of handling the issue may heavily influence their academic success in the future. Personally, I believe that arranging frequent meeting with my juniors and seniors is beneficial for me. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, freshmen can be open to other students, which means that they can ask personal questions and discuss particular problems. Pupils face different types of issue in post-secondary institutions, especially when they enroll classes at the first year. However, many individuals including me might be too intimidated to find answers of some questions from employees of universities. For instance, last year, I wanted to know personalities of some professors of my university. Unfortunately, I could not find answer of this questions from employees or other instructors of my university because I thought they may consider that I am discouraged to face strict professors. However, I could find the answer from my sophomore friend because I was not shy to discuss with her. As a result, I could find true information from the girl who was majoring in the same field, and solved my trouble. This example demonstrates the value of asking any questions from other learners by talking with them.
Secondly, being able to meet with others regularly can be advantageous for me because I may confront problems anytime but not only during the first week or so. Attending specific classes for only a week is not enough time to find sufficient information. On the other hand, if people are able to meet with other students, they can seek help whenever it is needed. For example, many freshmen start being panicked before semesters finish because they should take final exams and accomplish huge assignment load to receive satisfactory grades. They cannot get any help from knowledge they gained in the beginning of the semester from particular courses because they will probably face unfamiliar problems that were not mentioned in the course they took. Nevertheless, pupils can ask questions from other learners whenever they want. Consequently, available knowledge will not be limited to only curriculum of the first week.
In summation, I am of the opinion that freshmen of educational organizations should arrange frequent meeting with their seniors and juniors rather than taking any additional classes. This is because they can ask any questions from other undergraduates who are open to them, and learners are able to get help from others throughout the semester but during not only the first week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, freshmen can be open to o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fortunately, I could not find answer of this questions from employees or other instr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1000, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om other learners by talking with them. Secondly, being able to meet with others...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 922, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to only curriculum of the first week. In summation, I am of the opinion that f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17792792793 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8878783788 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2300615909 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04761904762 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0619736993 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223608122116 0.076458572812 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241594584391 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040508592397 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125212576717 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.