In order to maintain a relation, it is better to spend only little time with people we care to reduce the chance of conflicts or
it is better to spend as much time as possible with them?
“A life without a friend is a life without a sun.” To maintain a relationship with friend, they are many ways that can be employed. Specifically, what kind of the option is better for a relationship? Among the two ideas in the prompt, I would consider that spending as much time as possible with people is the most optimal choice.
To begin with, the more you accompany with people, the deeper bonding you have. For instance, my best friend Vivian, who I met from elementary school, always hangs out with me. We went to movies, shopping and sometimes we went to our secret place “Monet Cafe” which we considered as our office. What is more, while we graduated from high school, we built our webpage to document our life details and funny things. And now, we still go to Monet Cafe twice a week and share everything, it really make us more tight with each other. Thus, spending more time with friend can keep the relationship closer.
Moreover, there are plenty of mutual memories. To be more concise, my boyfriend and I have been together for five years, and we always stick together and create numerous memories. For example, we went to watch a NBA game last year, even though Golden State Warriors which is the team we support did not win the championship, we still have a precious memories, such as the whole stadium surrounded by the number of ten thousand fans keeping yelling “Let’s go Warriors “. Therefore, getting together with people for a long time can form many cherish stories.
Last but not least, it will cause alienation if you spend only little time with a person. Irrefutably, some people might claims that the less company with their friends or family will give more space to them. Take my family for example. My father is an old-fashioned person. He contends that we should be independent while our age reach eighteen, so he says that we should go home the less the better. However, spending such limited time alienates us, and we are not so intimate like before.
In brief, due to the reasons described above, time is exactly what we need if we are pursuing a more profound bonding with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... a week and share everything, it really make us more tight with each other. Thus, sp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riend can keep the relationship closer. Moreover, there are plenty of mutual mem...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...memories. For example, we went to watch a NBA game last year, even though Golden ...
^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'memory'?
Suggestion: memory
... championship, we still have a precious memories, such as the whole stadium surrounded b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in brief, kind of, such as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78877005348 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58535687603 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9868511349 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.55 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296665322953 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936028250402 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797446166191 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174940181969 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581034949905 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.