People can solve important problems in their daily life on their own or with the help from families. The help
from the government is not necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
Every person will face some unsolvable problem in the lifetime, it could be economic based or mentally based. However, people can assess helps from family or solve the problem by own, and there is government support too, for instance, non-profit psychological support, but sometime the support is not necessary, because people can get help from their family initially. In my opinion, the help from the government is not necessary.
First of all, some problems are intimate and they are not suitable for other to know. If the patient has some problems with the intimate experience, then it would not be suitable for the patient to tell someone else about the experience other than the family members. Even though government's support is more professional, but the doctor will only diagnose the patient base on self-reported, compare to family support, the family member knows the patient better, since they spend more time together.
Secondary, family support is easier to access than government support. In emergency situation, a faster support will be remarkable, in this sense, family support can be easily access, compare to the government support, it requires patient goes outdoor, which is unfavored in an emergency situation.
All in all, those are the reasons I believe help from government is not necessary due to the inconvenient and lack of privacy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1977.66487455 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 219.0 407.700716846 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24657534247 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7414834546 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 212.727598566 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3021738799 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190723460354 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907277079586 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974310034303 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123338292485 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11455264469 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.