People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that people learn things better from those who are at their own level than from their teachers or supervisors. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that teachers and supervisors have lots of experience on teaching or advising people. Therefore, they are able to solve problems very sooner than people at the same level. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that people learn things from their co-worker or classroom mat have several advantages over when people learn things directly from their supervisors or teachers.
First and foremost, people who are in the same position are more familiar with other people ideas, envision and understands. When people collaborate for a long time this familiarity with character and level of people information is helpful to transmit knowledge easier by them than through the supervisor. For example, last year I and my colleague worked on the same project, she was from a foreign country and had not very good ability in the Persian language. She always had difficulty to speak with our supervisor, nonetheless, because we worked together for a long time I had a clear view about her idea and intention it made me able to help her in the relationship with the professor.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that students spend more time sharing opinions and points of view with one other and discuss each issue. Inversely, often teachers have not enough time to discuss each little question or subject that raises by students because of limitation in classroom hours. Additionally, sometimes students embarrassed to explain their question because they are worried other students kidding them.
Finally, yet importantly, it is true that teachers have more information on different subjects and experience in teaching but what is the benefits of learning materials directly from teachers. It is substantiated that when students do research to find the answers, they learn more than when taking the solution directly from the teacher. Moreover, cooperation around an assignment encourages creativity and self-confidence in children.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I convinced that people learn things more effectively from those at their own level than from those at a higher level. Because people have similar mind and view, and the co-workers are able to spend more time to teach one other and because this way improves creativity on people and encourages them to learn more.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, for example, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2243902439 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74257854241 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7375807386 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.875 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402216986122 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142730183467 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176016670504 0.0737576698707 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234241365818 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180274619108 0.0645574589148 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.