People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are social beings and during their life, they are always learning and improving themselves. Interactions and discussions with their fellow-men are the best ways of obtaining new pieces of knowledge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own level of from those at a higher level? I definitely believe that the best way for someone to learn is by asking and cooperate with someone at the same level such as a student from his fellow students. In this essay, some of the most important points supporting this claim will be discussed.
To begin with, dealing and interacting with people at your own level is always easier and less stressful. The individual is not under high pressure like he would be in case of a discussion with someone at a higher level. He can express himself more efficiently without hesitating and fears of potential mistakes. A person being relaxed can focus more on the procedure of learning something that would be more difficult if he had to deal with someone who he would be stress with. Thus, the process of acquiring new knowledge becomes more relieving and probably more efficient.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that people at the same level such as a student with his fellow student of co-workers face usually if not same then similar difficulties and challenges. This means that there is a better understanding between them that can promise an essential cooperation for upcoming tasks to be completed. Also, people become more responsible and mature in the absence of more experienced and expert than them to lead their steps.
Finally, another advantage of learning from people at your own level is that this process could be fun too. Leaning and working with those at the same level of the educational or work hierarchy offers some opportunities for relaxation. The interaction does not have the rigid character and formality that would have in case of co-operating with people of a higher level. For instance, students who study together and try to fill their knowledge gaps have the flexibility to joke between them and having a bit fun.
To sum up, taking into account of all things have been spoken above it could be concluded that learning from people at your own level is not only more effective and also a joyful process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People are social beings and during thei...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...w pieces of knowledge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own lev...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...ge. But people learn better things from those ones at their own level of from those at a h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orting this claim will be discussed. To begin with, dealing and interacting w...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lieving and probably more efficient. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pert than them to lead their steps. Finally, another advantage of learning f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92802056555 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65717267223 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519280205656 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9010767322 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370655445917 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127613265813 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131033500986 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225868662994 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950027104161 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.