I personally agree with the statement because I learned many things from friends, siblings and colleagues. I would support my opinion affected by educational perspective and as individual in the society.
First, about educational knowledge, I would learn basics things from teachers. For example, the things we learn mandatory in school such as biology or history topics are explained by a teachers not friends. However, when I was a high school student, I discussed about how the flowers grew up in a class. All students have different expectations and perspective therefore as many as we exchange ideas, we learn the thing that we could think about it by many ways. Teachers teach us the abstract or aspect of studies and it does not help us to train to solve problems and build own opinions. Hence, I would think that learning from fellow students or co-workers are better in a educational occasion.
Second, about social individual skill. As long as we are belonged to community or society, we are supposed to get along with people and surrounded by people and in that situation, we also need to know what we could do, what we should do as an individual. From my personal experience, that is the things we have to figure out by ourself which is teachers or supervisors do not tell us. For instance, I was in Finland as exchange student for an entire year. At first, I had trouble with other international students because of lack of language skill. Moreover, I was so confused by the cultural difference and I did not have fun time at that time. However, my roommates helped me to find solution for getting used to environment and people around by showing. She led me to language exchange club and how to communicate with local people. The teacher did not tell me just gave me some tips to learn the society contrary to roommates.
All of considered, I would think that learning things from people at my own level is better than those at a high level. It is more practical and easier to absorb their ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...logy or history topics are explained by a teachers not friends. However, when I was a high...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...tudies and it does not help us to train to solve problems and build own opinions. Hence,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ow students or co-workers are better in a educational occasion. Second, about ...
^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...red, I would think that learning things from people at my own level is better than t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73863636364 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72679920132 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519886363636 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6550166247 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7894736842 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291455472285 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833102680548 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955052303539 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200507404317 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990654433736 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.