TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV

The lecturer and author are both talking about the benefit by the professors appearance on television and the speaker refutes the main point made in the reading passage. The following three points of view between two parties are presented as followed.

First of all, the lady argues that the professor does not get any advantages by television appearance which questions the author's point of view that they enhance their importance as scholars. According to the teacher, she states that TV program prefer to have guest who is not serous about issue. Thus, the professors on TV are tended to be entertainer so there are not invited to important conferences.

Second, the speaker points that the professors spend too much time to prepare for TV program instead of researching or meeting with students at campus. They take time to travel, make a presentation and even for their nice look. In the reading passage, the author claims that university would have advantages from their teacher's appearance such as highly regard from public and increasing potential applicants. However, the universities would not get these benefits as they expect.

Lastly, the lecturer says that public viewers expect that they will have widely knowledge of studies but the tv program only cares about their academic title thus the public obtain only brief of subjects. She also tells that the information from the professors on television is as same as we get from the reporter did little homework beforehand.

Therefore, the main points made by the speaker in the lecture cast doubt on the main points made in the reading passage.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e both talking about the benefit by the professors appearance on television and the speake...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, lastly, look, second, so, therefore, thus, such as, talking about, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59844683461 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.863372836 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834813922635 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340299282688 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364760911552 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467495602115 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341920626389 0.0443174109184 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.