While the reading passage emphasizes the idea that the Euro currency brought many benefits to the European Union, the professor suggests that opinion which the author made is outdated and written in a optimistic way.
According to the text, the Euro keeps market prices stable between only the EU countries because they do not require to exchange money. In contrast, the speaker tells us that if they do business with the countries outside of EU, it would not be the matter to them. For example, China and UK have different currency thus they need to convert money therefore value of currency would be changed.
The other point discussed by both the author and speaker is about a tariff. Whereas the lecturer made the point that the Euro is stable and led us to do international trading therefore there are less risks to get loss suddenly. However, the Euro have not given us notable change yet because many countries have already had international business before they accepted common currency. The professor says that it would be easier to do import and export but not much advantages for us.
Finally, the writer depictes that the Euro facilitates people to work another country with minimal financial risk. On the other hand, the lecturer tells there has not been restrict so migration is not rare anymore. She thinks that the reason why many people try to get a chance to move to another country is not currency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a optimistic way" with adverb for "optimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eading passage is out dated and written in a optimistic way. The following reasons will support her...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing passage is out dated and written in a optimistic way. The following reasons w...
^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
..., the lecturer tells there has not been restrict so migration is not rare anymore. She t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47647058717 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59670781893 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2079944193 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130053437537 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427078102291 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428400746505 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687462244461 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512795441203 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.