No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of spending money on our self, especially clothes and accessories. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select spend a humble amount of money to by clothes. It is my firm belief people do not need costly clothes to enhance their appearance for a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, everywhere on the earth there are expensive and low cost clothes, so humans can either purchase from brands or ordinary markets. As a result, if you buy from market that offer clothes in low price, you will save your money. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Three years ago, I went to a local market in my country to purchase a new shoes, in this market you can find any shoes you want from different brands from the world. In addition,the shoeses are used, but in a high quality as new. Subsequently, I choosed a shoes in low price approximately five dollars. Few days later, my friend was wearing the same shoes, but he bought it from a famous brand for 55 dollars. Consequently, I asked my friend why he paid this amount of money, so he said he want to show that he is wealthy and this will increase his appearance, but after I said to him I bought it in 5 dollars, he surprised and he asked me to take him with me in the next time. As a result, we both saved our money and preserved our value between our friends and neighbors.
Secondly, many scholars and scientists wear cheap clothes and their value in the society is very high. Drawing from my own experience. When I was at the university, one of my professors said to me at one time, it does not matter from where you purshaced your clothes, the matter is how is wearing the clothes. Therefore, I took this rule from my lecturer, so I am always enhancing my thinking and intellectual development throgh studying , reading sophisticated subjects and having new certificates in many fields.
Finally, I strongly feel that I disagree with people how spent huge money on their clothes to increase thier character. This is because this may help you save your money to utilize it in different places and the paramount is your thinking and knowledge, not your clothes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'shoe'?
Suggestion: shoe
... market in my country to purchase a new shoes, in this market you can find any shoes ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...erent brands from the world. In addition,the shoeses are used, but in a high quality...
^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a shoe' or simply 'shoes'?
Suggestion: a shoe; shoes
...quality as new. Subsequently, I choosed a shoes in low price approximately five dollars...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...aid this amount of money, so he said he want to show that he is wealthy and this wil...
^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...intellectual development throgh studying , reading sophisticated subjects and havi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58413461538 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66228527457 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526442307692 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9351462406 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.944444444 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135569420211 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495792821374 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064757583216 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11769725285 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914965524954 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.