The reading and the lecture are both about Ethanol fuel which extracted from some plants like corn and sugar cane. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about disagreement of many people toward using Ethanol instead of gasoline. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that ethanol is a pretty alternative for gasoline and none of these reasons are persuasive.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states using ethanol will not solve any environmental problems like golbal warming. The article mentions that ethanol unleash carbon dioxide to the atmosphere which assists in rise heat. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that using ethanol will not add any problem to global warming because ethanol made of plants that absorp carbon dioxide. Additionally, he points out that ethanol will remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Secondly, the author suggests producing enormous quantity of ethanol may drop the number of plants that used for feed animals. In the article it is said that continuing make this process will make abcense of food for fauna and flora. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states establish ethanol will not decline any source of food. He goes on to say that ethanol extracted from plants cell walls which is not eat by animals.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that the price of ethanol is the same of gasolie with aid of the government, so if the govenment stop this help the price will boost. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by contending that in the future ethanol will compete with gasoline, but increase production of ethanol will decrease the price of it. He notes that if the production quantity of ethanol multiplied by three, so the price of ethanol will drop to 40 percent.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...ted from plants cell walls which is not eat by animals. Finally, the author brin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06031746032 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54785589563 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520634920635 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0857966585 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262877731566 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934425249507 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654598974028 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173729745609 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875849888647 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...ted from plants cell walls which is not eat by animals. Finally, the author brin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06031746032 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54785589563 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520634920635 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0857966585 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262877731566 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934425249507 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654598974028 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173729745609 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875849888647 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.