People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
People who are capricious make their decisions on their emotions. They do not take into account the logic for making that decision so the ramification may be a poor decision. These people should rather make their decisions based on the logic than on the emotions.
People who make their decisions from the logical point of view are not poor decision makers because their decision is based on the logic and they have considered all the viewpoints. While on the other hand the people who make their decisions on the emotions are unpredictable as they make their decisions hastily. When these people who have made their decisions and justify their decisions afterwards with various logical reasoning it is useless as the decision is already made. So there is no point in justifying it with logic afterwards.
For example-In a cricket match when a captain makes decisions regarding field placements he may sometimes take decisions based on the emotions at that time. Therefore, the decision made may be poor as the logic is missing from the decision.
The logical decision may be right in majority of the cases as one has taken that decision based on the reasons one has thought in the mind. The decisions based on emotions may sometimes prove right and in some cases may prove wrong. For example-In a cricket match, when a captain makes the field placements considering the batsman's strengths and weaknesses then the decision will be rewarding in most of the cases.
People who have made their decisions based on the emotions and then justify them with logic demonstrates that the logic was missing from their minds when they made the decisions previously.
It may be possible that the people who have made their decisions on the emotions are good decision makers as the emotions drive them to think of the decision in a fruitful way. This is possible in many cases of the people. For example-The current Indian cricket team captain Virat Kohli sometimes makes his decisions on the emotions displayed by him on the field. The emotions drive him to make better decisions.
Thus, the people who make their decisions on the basis of emotions and thereafter justify it with the logic are poor decision makers as they have made their decisions on the spur of the moment and hastily. This shows that these people may not be able to think of logic at the time of making their decisions so they need to justify it with logic afterwards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey have considered all the viewpoints. While on the other hand the people who make t...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 159, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fruitful way" with adverb for "fruitful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ons drive them to think of the decision in a fruitful way. This is possible in many cases of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-The current Indian cricket team captain Virat Kohli sometimes makes his decision...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in many cases', 'in some cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24200913242 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.173515981735 0.158761421928 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0707762557078 0.0866891130778 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0365296803653 0.046263068375 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0730593607306 0.0685040099705 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143835616438 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0547945205479 0.0351676179071 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49716925537 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00913242009132 0.0309702414327 29% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127853881279 0.0887237588012 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0228310502283 0.0209618222197 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0251141552511 0.0139019557991 181% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2440.0 2387.08602151 102% => OK
No of words: 416.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86538461538 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.298076923077 0.338922669872 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242788461538 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185096153846 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120192307692 0.112833075102 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49716925537 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.341346153846 0.524397521467 65% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 36.7691971353 59.2087087015 62% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8947368421 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1547190689 48.84282405 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.421052632 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.5376344086 154% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 46.173582996 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.5564516129 1.45489161554 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344968610423 0.300154397459 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.189188478579 0.103427244359 183% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106104851034 0.0752933317313 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66780865461 0.497263757937 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161320740778 0.151897553556 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181499533218 0.114077575197 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985284630868 0.0781384742642 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.456532425295 0.336927656856 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114243251214 0.067059652881 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262508184878 0.210909579961 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105302812621 0.0618886996521 170% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.