Prompt: Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
People are divided into two types. Some of them enjoy working in small companies while others prefer big ones. Personally, even the thought of working for a little company seems repulsive to me. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, should one work for a small company, he will probably end up repeating the same tasks over and over again with no variations. In other words, not only do large companies offer different tasks every day but they also provide their employees with considerably more opportunities for career growth. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Some years ago, when I worked for a local shipping company I was required to complete the same tasks and handle the same problems every single day. Needless to say, I did not get the chance to gain experience and my career growth became stagnant. In contrast, when I landed a job in a big international shipping company my days at work changed radically. Not only was I requested to deal with different situations every single day which made my job exciting rather than dull and mundane but also I was given the opportunity to get promoted to higher positions.
Secondly, in a large company people get the chance to meet new people and broaden their circle of acquaintances. To be more specific, in huge corporations there is a huge number of employees working , but also employees change constantly since some of them quit their jobs and others get their positions. In this way, you will never work with the same people. For instance, when I worked as a programmer for a big international IT company I made many friends working in the same field as I did and these relationships benefited us both in the long run. When I lost my job these people with whom I was working in the past helped me to find another one soon. Were I to work in a small company, it would have been more difficult to land a good job since I would have much fewer people that could recommend me to some employers or give me advice about how to pass successfully an interview with my future manager.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that working in a huge company proves to be considerably more beneficial compared to working in a tiny company. This is because not only do large companies offer their workers better career prospects and enable them to gain relevant knowledge but they also help them meet new people and handle various tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovide their employees with considerably more opportunities for career growth. My...
^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot get the chance to gain experience and my career growth became stagnant. In con...
^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re is a huge number of employees working , but also employees change constantly si...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...a programmer for a big international IT company I made many friends working in the same...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hips benefited us both in the long run. When I lost my job these people with whom I ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64220183486 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62954652388 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8956069735 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.526315789 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9473684211 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325176630807 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104818503863 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772019202385 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221026161545 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910355491961 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.