Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have differing views with regard to the living in one place or moving to other places in person's entire lives. While some argue that living in one place is better, I believe that migrating to new cities have more advantages and I strongly agree with this idea.
The first reason is that when people move to new citiy, there are more chance in favor of traveller in various aspect. In the individual prospective, nowadays, more people migrating to new area in order to get new and better job. In todays hectic life, people are often trying to rach an ambious life. In rhis regard, they would have to leave their home town or village in search of better job. Specifically, they choose a city with high potential for their goals. New destination, not only have more job opportunities, and a high level of employment, but also it must provides high salaries and better quality of life. All of these encourage people to move to new towns to support themselves, for example, be able to buy an affordable house, or even riase a family. consequently, all of these factors are attractive for those who are trying to select new town for living.
Another subtle point is that having more opportunities for those who perfer to move another, more likely, better area. On the sociatel level, living in more developed cities, could provide and motivate people to work hard and applied themselves to develope their skills and abilities. New manager, friendly colleagues and workpalce atmoshere are some examples that person could experience and inspire to reach high level of performace. These elements can help one to gain real experience and learn practical skills that all are important in their chosen field. Moreover, in our globalised world, adults can expect to come into contact with people who have a huge variety of background, and this aim is possible when they decide to travell and live for years in new environment. Finally, it is unlikely to find a person who dose not to live in city where there are more facilities, well-funded education system, and other public services. On the contrary, some may argue that in those areas, there are more social crime, more crowded streets or even more air and noise polluters, but there are some measures that governments or even individuals could take to tackle these issues.
In conclusion, I fully support the view that moving from one place on search of better quality of life, in both individual and social level, even with some minor drawback, could be effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e often trying to rach an ambious life. In rhis regard, they would have to leave t...
^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...fordable house, or even riase a family. consequently, all of these factors are attractive fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... that all are important in their chosen field. Moreover, in our globalised world, adu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88811188811 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53692526627 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5486278904 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193184545807 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690103189517 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575831298678 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157062417285 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064615823259 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.