Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have,but,in fact,it is a good quality for a person to have.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Making an important decision is one of the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is necessary for us to make our decisions precisely and wisely. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether taking a lot of time to make important decisions is a weakness or not. Some people possess the conviction that this trait is showing the bad quality of those persons, whereas I think the opposite and allege, and believe this shows a good attribute. To substantiate my point of view the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that taking a lot of time to think carefully about certain issues is beneficial for us. We can evaluate and analyze different dimensions and results of our decisions and it will bring us ensures about the consequences of our decisions. In particular, we can feel amiable about our future. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. When I was a teenager, I was sonder which field suited for my professional carer and life. I researched different fields and take a lot of time to analyze the difference between law courses and computer science programming. I remember that I spent all my free time researching and thinking and finally I chose computer science which now is more beneficial for me.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that when we take a lot of time thinking about our decisions, we adapted to think logically and critically which will grow our personality and perspective. Specifically, if we used this method in other life aspects we can gain prestige in society, and people can remember us as a person who is logical and reliable. As a data scientist, I spend a lot of my time thinking about different approaches to find better and more efficient solutions and overcome my problems. My boss always says that I am a wise person and ask my opinion on different aspects of his life.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons I think taking a lot of time before making important decisions is beneficial because we can feel ensure about our decision's consequences and, on the other hand, it will bring us prestige and prosperity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, i think, in brief, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83790523691 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87052892666 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488778054863 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1480356857 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.117647059 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229113062338 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774382785191 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479821662953 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150716628359 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529236356019 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.