Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have, but, in fact, it is a good quality for a person to have.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The process of making a decision, especially for vital issues, is complex and needs time to make a reliable conclusion. Some people assume that this is a bad feature for individuals who need time to make a decision. However, others think the quality of decisions that they make is more important. From my point of view, this is a good characteristic of a person who spends time making a decision. I have this opinion for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To embark upon, the process of making a vital decision need some information, and gaining related data from different sources is a time taking process. This information can give the individual a broader horizon to prevent potential mistakes and errors and boost the quality of the task. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this; when I was a master's student, I had to find the best treatments for my thesis. Most of my classmates presented their proposals by spending a short time on them. I did my best to investigate different references and reduce potential errors in my task, and it took a lot of my time. Consequently, when I started the practical part, I did not encounter major problems, and it boosted the quality of my thesis.
The other equally significant reason worth mentioning is that spending a lot of time making an important decision can present a good personality feature of an individual since he spends his time making a good decision that may affect other people. In other words, people who care about their duties and the consequences of their decisions prefer to make the perfect decisions in order to boost the quality of their tasks. For instance, three years ago, I started a job at a company as a research assistant. Because I like my job, I spend a lot of time on my tasks, and most of the time, I make good and reliable decisions that increase the quality of the project. This characteristic of mine was so interesting to my boss, and I was promoted less than a year to the head of the research and development department.
To recapitulate, this is crucial for people who want to make a vital decision to spend enough time on it. During this time, they can collect information that can decrease the possibility of mistakes and enhance the quality of the task. Also, other people can be influenced by this personality feature since it is a sign of being responsible and paying attention to the decision's consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The process of making a decision, especi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l explore in the following paragraphs. To embark upon, the process of making a ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'masters'' or 'master's'?
Suggestion: masters'; master's
...mpelling evidence of this; when I was a masters student, I had to find the best treatme...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d it boosted the quality of my thesis. The other equally significant reason wor...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... research and development department. To recapitulate, this is crucial for peo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72429906542 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86164882136 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457943925234 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2875612042 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.421052632 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271532310711 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903073272512 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569269235773 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180211582462 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732391773202 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.