Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (well-liked)and effective in helping students learn.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are many ways through which teachers can influence the process of learning in students. Some teachers employ different ways to be popular among students and boost their interest in class material. Still, there are some teachers who just pay attention to class materials and do not pay attention to their relationship with students. From my point of view, the first group is more successful and effective in helping students learn. I have this opinion for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To embark upon, students can be affected by their teachers; this is vital for teachers to treat them like a friend. In other words, it has been proven that students pay more attention during class to those teachers who they like, and this leads them to absorb more class materials. Also, students who like a teacher want to show them as effective people in a class, and it can boost their efficiency. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this; when I was in high school, one of my biology teachers treated us as his friend; consequently, most of the class paid attention during his class, and we did our tasks with effort because we like his personality and his lesson was interesting to us.
The other equally significant reason worth mentioning is that students encounter some issues during class if they feel bored and frustrated. Teachers employ some specific ways to prevent this phenomenon. As a result, the atmosphere of their class will be interesting to students, and this is because they will be popular with students. This is because not only do students feel different during their class, but also teachers can easily convey the concepts, and this positive feeling can remarkably affect students' performance and their process of learning. For instance, when I was a sophomore in university, I participated in a very difficult course. Our professor employed an interesting method of teaching, he used games as an approach, and he was his class popular among students. Every session was interesting to me since I learned a lot of things without any problems, and the professor's method was interesting to me.
To recapitulate, this is crucial that teachers have a good relationship with students and be popular among them. This is because this relationship can influence students' performance and their process of learning. Also, teachers' behavior and the way they teach can have significant effects on the quality of the class and students' learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are many ways through which teache...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l explore in the following paragraphs. To embark upon, students can be affected...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and his lesson was interesting to us. The other equally significant reason wor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 888, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...of things without any problems, and the professors method was interesting to me. To r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofessors method was interesting to me. To recapitulate, this is crucial that te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, still, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02891566265 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77248157545 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460240963855 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4616281221 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.842105263 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201593548605 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794371440905 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367997247612 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145577972044 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322540805922 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.