Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is a significant factor for a country to grow. Therefore, more and more people are concerning the issue of the teaching instrumentality. Some people maintain that teachers who are always rigid will more likely to initiate students better while other assert that teachers can not only be popular but also educate their student with the gorgeous instrumentalities. In my opinion, teacher can be both well liked and effective in making students improve. In what follow I will elaborate on my perspective.
First and foremost, teachers who employ the correct method to rectify students’ wrong learning concept may save both teachers’ and students’ time. Hence, teachers can secure more time to interact with their students, which can corroborate their relationship. For example, if the students do not comprehend the math exercises in their homework, teacher who can directly point out their blind spot will let students be delighted because this make them have better capability to handle other arduous tasks, which means that students will feel grateful to that teacher. After discussing, teacher can also use the spare time, which is saved by potent teaching instrumentalities, to ask about their future plan and give them some useful advice. This may let their relationship become robust because they understand each other better.
In addition, the teacher whose students achieve high performance will also be prominent because more parents will more likely to let those teachers to cultivate their children. This may let students interact with teachers in the polite way owing to their parents’ command. For instance, the teacher who always let students readily have a grasp about the science concept will receive more attention. More and more parents will ask their children to behavior well in the teacher’s class with the aim of attending the teacher’s lectures. This will let students less like to provoke teacher’s indignation. In this positive environment, teachers’ relation with their students will be ideal. In this manner the teacher will not only be popular but also perform well in educating.
To sum up, teacher who exercise the effective way to help students can have more time to interact with students, which in turn strengthens their relationship. Besides, the parents will also ask their children to behavior well in those teachers’ class. This virtuous communication will let the teachers have positive imagine in students’ mind. It is obvious that teachers who do great in teaching can also be welcoming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...o grow. Therefore, more and more people are concerning the issue of the teaching instrumentali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reat in teaching can also be welcoming.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36972704715 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83621417667 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473945409429 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9567871598 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.047619048 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229874454846 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952239484393 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570866233363 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174502649785 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275092259133 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.