Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, due to the cutting edge technology, traveling to different countries become convenience. People can learn their cultural and experience vary food or landscape in different city. Living in those city is a good chance to recognize more about that. Besides, living in different places can also let people have the capability to grapple with many arduous tasks because people have less friends who can help them in those places. In my perspective, living in different cities have more benefits.
To begin with, people can learn other country's cultures in turn widen their horizon. People live in other city can meet plenty of friends who will not encounter in the origin city. People can also learn the merits in their culture and introduce to many places. They can also enjoy the gorgeous foods which will not appear in the native city. Sometimes, those friends can help people to deal with some knotty problems. For example, people can travel to many country and interact with the professors there which can secure the significant information about the project people are making. Different country have different education. Therefore, the researchers there can wrestle with the same question from different aspect, which is very useful when the people encounter the bottleneck. They can also make more friends and build the strong relationship from many places thorough this interaction.
In addition, people can obtain a bunch of skills by living in different places. People live in the unfamiliar city need to deal with the problems themself. They can also learn the language efficiently way because they need to employ it in their everyday life. To illustrate, people who study aboard need to handle with their daily life themself. If they are in the country which do not usage their native language, they need to study hard in order to communicate with other and learn the knowledges in the classes. This ability can make them do better when next time they live in another country. They will also less likely to be crumble by the pressure because they have the experiences about living themself.
To sum up, living in different cities can let people secure the knowledge from different cultures and widen their horizon. Moreover, people have the ability about handling the problems in their daily life because they have more experiences about it. In the flip side, living in one place can not obtain the experiences in different city and have less aspect of the solution to one questions. On top of that, people live in one city will have less power to solve the problems in their daily life. It is evident that living in different cities have more merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun friends is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... many arduous tasks because people have less friends who can help them in those plac...
^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...op of that, people live in one city will have less power to solve the problems in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00448430493 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42916499372 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412556053812 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8272363321 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8461538462 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121518327838 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489262210159 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424675913389 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918279886401 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359777223646 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.