TPO 64- integrated
There is a discussion concerning the issue of establishing a novel fashion of broccoli that can be cultivated in East Coast, which the lecture in the listening puts forward some severe paradoxes against the claims expressed in the reading by invoking some cogent proof. She states that these explanations of the text are scant of validity.
To begin with, it is argued in the reading that cultivating broccoli locally may decrease the transportation cost, which in turn can decline the price. Nonetheless, the professor distinctly identifies the flaws views in the passage. Subsequently, she potently disproves the opinion by mentioning that the yield of the broccoli which is grown in East Coast will be very low, which means that seller should increase the price to maintain the profit. This make the saving of transportation cost meaningless.
In addition, strikingly a thorough counterargument made by the lecture is presented against the claim in the text in which author declares that scientists can exercise the genetic modification technology to create the original crop which have no safety problem. Rather, she maintains that the company engaging in the genetic modification have generated some hazardous food, which will let consumers not willing to accept their products anymore.
Last but not least, the reading passage takes the view that eating the vegetable opportunely will make people absorb most gorgeous material because the vegetable will maintain the nutrient and vitamin; on the contrary, the speaker repudiate the notion, since other local vegetable also possesses that nutrient and they harvest not only on summer. Therefore, people can purchase the local food instead of buying the broccoli.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42007434944 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82782120005 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598513011152 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.6255718937 49.2860985944 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.8 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329722780603 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111392625102 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677940120966 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180195949409 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592648833669 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.