Question Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Question :Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

People around me seem to complain a lot about how their boring jobs are consuming their passion for work and how they need to step out of their comfort zone and try something new. However, there are also people who like to spend days doing the same tasks they are most comfortable with. Each working style has its pros and cons, and personally, I believe the former is more enjoyable. Needless to say, it would generate bigger challenges and higher pressure, but, at the same time, it also leads to a greater sense of satisfaction.

First, dealing with multiple tasks can improve work efficiency, which, in return, brings a sense of achievement. Doing similar tasks would never be a thrilling job as people tend to get worn out and distracted after a while. With the decline of concentration level, high work efficiency would be hard to maintain. People may feel that time gets wasted and they have not gained too much in the work process. When learning a new language, have you tried to spend the whole day doing nothing but reciting some new words from a vocabulary book? It is an almost effortless task as the stakes of task completion are low. However, are you enjoying doing it for several hours or even several days? Would you feel satisfied repeating the same thinking process over and over again? To most people, the answer would be no. After a while, without new accomplishments, without feeling a sense of fulfilment, repetition of work would render the whole process monotonous and painful.

Besides, working with various tasks tests hones people’s skills and promote personal growth. One strategy a lot of companies uses to explore their employees potential is to give employees the chance to take the initiative. They give them these changes by allowing them to “break things” and learn from those mistakes. This ultimately creates room for learning and innovation. A survey conducted by the Bureau invited 100 HR members from Top 500 companies. In a questionnaire, they were asked to list three things they would do to maximize their employees’ potential, and kindle their aspiration. 87% of them mentioned new projects or responsibilities. It is believed that pushing employees out of their comfort zone and encouraging them to take more responsibility would maintain employees’ working momentum. One HR said that people would more likely want to work with satisfaction when they have something interesting to do. Putting people to do some tedious jobs is like adding a glass ceiling in their career path. As a result, job hopping would become more frequent.

Admittedly, working on the same project would also be nice. People can refine their work little by little, and they don’t have to be faced with time pressure or other challenges. But doing the same task over and over again just results in the task being very easy. If people cannot see their personal growth, they would more likely get bored than get satisfied.

All in all, I believe that simpleness would not necessarily be equivalent to self-satisfaction. In fact. I believe it is quite the opposite, people might feel more content when they challenge themselves to do something new and try to accomplish something they have never accomplished before.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0036900369 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74891403462 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3997442092 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4838709677 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4838709677 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45161290323 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225841010153 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592873532954 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575587400492 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145309187472 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272605755499 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0036900369 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74891403462 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3997442092 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4838709677 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4838709677 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45161290323 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225841010153 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592873532954 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575587400492 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145309187472 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272605755499 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.